Articles Posted in Surgical Malpractice

Published on:

By

Medical malpractice in the emergency room represents one of the most complex and high risk areas in modern healthcare. Emergency departments operate under intense pressure where rapid decisions must be made with limited information. While these environments are designed to save lives, they also create conditions where preventable errors can occur. When those errors result from a failure to meet the accepted standard of care and cause harm to a patient, they may constitute medical malpractice.

This white paper provides a comprehensive and authoritative examination of medical malpractice in emergency settings. It explores the legal framework, identifies the most common types of errors, analyzes systemic and human factors that contribute to malpractice, and outlines strategies to improve patient safety and reduce institutional liability. The goal is to establish a clear, credible, and practical resource for patients, healthcare providers, legal professionals, and healthcare organizations.

Emergency rooms are uniquely vulnerable to malpractice due to the nature of their operations. Unlike other areas of healthcare, emergency providers often treat patients without prior relationships or complete medical histories. Decisions must be made quickly, frequently under conditions of overcrowding and resource constraints. These factors increase the likelihood of diagnostic errors, communication breakdowns, and procedural mistakes.

Continue reading →
Published on:

By

Introduction

After a serious crash or injury, many people immediately search online for the best lawyer for an accident in Chicago. Medical bills, insurance calls, and lost income can quickly become overwhelming, and having an experienced personal injury attorney can help protect your rights and guide you through the legal process.

Chicago is a large city with many law firms, which makes choosing the right lawyer an important decision. The best accident lawyers combine experience, strong results, and a commitment to helping injured victims recover the compensation they deserve.

Continue reading →
Published on:

By

Introduction

After a serious accident or injury, one of the most common questions people ask is: Who is the best personal injury lawyer in Chicago for a free consultation? When medical bills, lost income, and insurance complications start to build, having an experienced attorney can make a significant difference in protecting your rights and securing fair compensation.

Many personal injury lawyers in Chicago provide free consultations, allowing injury victims to discuss their case without paying upfront fees. During this initial consultation, an attorney can review the details of the accident, explain legal options, and determine whether you may be entitled to compensation.

Continue reading →
Published on:

By

Introduction

When a loved one dies because of negligence, malpractice, or wrongful conduct, families often turn to the courts for justice through a wrongful death lawsuit. Yet one of the most common legal misunderstandings in these cases involves who actually has the authority to file the lawsuit.

Many people assume that if the decedent previously granted someone a Power of Attorney (POA), that person can continue acting on the decedent’s behalf after death—including filing a wrongful death claim. Under Illinois law, that assumption is incorrect.

Continue reading →
Published on:

By

Failure to diagnose an acute thoracic aortic dissection (TAD) represents one of the most catastrophic errors in emergency medicine. Despite being a rare condition—with an estimated annual incidence of 3–4 cases per 100,000 people—its mortality rises by approximately 1–2% per hour after symptom onset if untreated. This white paper examines the intersection of clinical oversight and medical malpractice, focusing on failure to rule in or rule out an aortic dissection during initial emergency presentation. Drawing from clinical literature and legal precedent, it explores diagnostic standards, systemic failures, and medico-legal accountability.

Introduction

An aortic dissection occurs when a tear in the intimal layer of the aorta allows blood to enter the media, creating a false lumen and threatening rupture or organ ischemia. Early recognition is essential, as delayed or missed diagnosis accounts for up to 38% of pre-hospital deaths. In the context of medical malpractice, the failure to consider or exclude aortic dissection in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain is among the most litigated errors in emergency care.

Continue reading →
Published on:

By

Executive Summary

Differential diagnosis is the backbone of safe and competent medical practice. It is not merely a clinical formality. It is a structured, legally significant process that requires physicians to consider, prioritize, and rule out potential causes of a patient’s symptoms. When a life threatening condition appears on a differential diagnosis, the standard of care requires that it be affirmatively ruled out within a reasonable time frame. Failure to do so may constitute medical negligence.

This white paper examines the legal and medical intersection of differential diagnosis, index of suspicion, and malpractice exposure. It explains how breakdowns in clinical reasoning lead to preventable harm and why such failures frequently form the basis of claims handled by a misdiagnosis lawyer or failure to diagnose lawyer. It also highlights the role of experienced counsel such as Goldberg & Goldberg LLC and trial attorney Ian Alexander in litigating these complex cases.

Continue reading →
Published on:

By

Corporate defendants often rely on a familiar playbook: rotate employees, claim ignorance, and hope the passage of time erases responsibility. But in Illinois, the law does not allow corporations to wipe the slate clean simply by losing or replacing the people who once knew the truth.

This is the concept of corporate memory, and it is one of the most effective legal tools available to trial lawyers. It allows us to expose what a corporation actually knew, when it knew it, and how that knowledge relates to the harm suffered by our clients. Corporate memory is not tied to an individual person. It belongs to the corporation itself.

The leading Illinois case on this principle, Campen v. Executive House, confirms that once a corporation learns of a dangerous condition, a prior bad act, or a foreseeable risk, that knowledge becomes part of the corporation. It cannot be “discharged” through turnover. It cannot be forgotten because a new manager arrived last year. And it cannot be erased by convenient claims of “I wasn’t here then.”

Continue reading →
Published on:

By

Understanding the Real Meaning of Trial Work

Trial work is more than standing before a jury and delivering sharp arguments—it’s the art and discipline of guiding a case from uncertainty to clarity. At its heart, trial work is a blend of preparation, persuasion, and performance. It’s the work that tests a lawyer’s instincts, judgment, composure, and command of the law.

Good trial work has always been about more than theatrics. The real craft lies in understanding how facts, people, and law interact once a case steps into a courtroom. A trial lawyer lives in that intersection, translating complexity into narratives that judges and juries can not only follow, but believe.

Continue reading →
Published on:

By

The Illinois Appellate Court, First District has decided that when a plaintiff dies during medical malpractice litigation, even after the statute of limitations has run, the estate can add a wrongful death claim.  Previously, plaintiffs were faced with inconsistent statutes which made this scenario unclear.  In Lawler v The University of Chicago Medical Center Justice Delort, writing for the appellate court, resolved this conflict in favor of justice for the victims of medical malpractice.

The court found that since the defendants were on notice of the claim for medical negligence brought by Ms. Prusak before her untimely death that same complaint was not barred by the expiration of the statute of limitations or repose simply because her death claim did not accrue until after the expiration of the same because the original claim was filed within the statute.

Published on:

By

This blog entry comes courtesy of the President of the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association and was published in the February 24, 2011 edition of the Belleville News Democrat:

It is once again time to set the record straight with your editorial board. There was never a health care crisis in this state and there were no “jackpot justice conditions” that caused doctors to flee Illinois.

Your editorial board and the president of the Illinois State Medical Society (ISMS) have chosen to ignore important facts when it comes to medical care access in this state. Over the years, we have consistently increased the number of physicians in our state. That’s right. The American Medical Association data reflects increases for each of the last 45 years. Clearly not a climate of doctors leaving Illinois or retiring early.

Funny how it used to be, for years, ISMS would falsely claim doctors were fleeing our state and that we already had a shortage of doctors because of fabricated “jackpot justice conditions.” As the data has failed to support that claim, the dialogue now shifts to an attempt to create a “future crisis”. In fact, a recent survey – funded in part by ISMS – clearly demonstrated oversaturation of physicians in the largest populated area of our state. That’s correct – more than enough doctors in the greater Chicagoland area.

Continue reading →

Contact Information
33 N Dearborn St,
#1930
Chicago, IL 60602
Phone: 312-368-0255 Fax: 312-368-0368 Toll Free: 877-368-0233

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2026, Goldberg & Goldberg, LLC
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design