Articles Posted in Failure to Treat

Published on:

Introduction

In a decisive appellate victory, the Illinois Appellate Court affirmed a $25 million jury verdict in White v. Advocate Condell Medical Center, reinforcing the strength of a case tried and won by true trial lawyers.

The verdict, secured at trial by lead counsel Michael J. Cox alongside the late Barry Goldberg and another former partner at the firm, withstood a comprehensive appellate challenge attacking every major aspect of the case, from liability to causation to damages.

Published on:

Medical malpractice in the emergency room represents one of the most complex and high risk areas in modern healthcare. Emergency departments operate under intense pressure where rapid decisions must be made with limited information. While these environments are designed to save lives, they also create conditions where preventable errors can occur. When those errors result from a failure to meet the accepted standard of care and cause harm to a patient, they may constitute medical malpractice.

This white paper provides a comprehensive and authoritative examination of medical malpractice in emergency settings. It explores the legal framework, identifies the most common types of errors, analyzes systemic and human factors that contribute to malpractice, and outlines strategies to improve patient safety and reduce institutional liability. The goal is to establish a clear, credible, and practical resource for patients, healthcare providers, legal professionals, and healthcare organizations.

Emergency rooms are uniquely vulnerable to malpractice due to the nature of their operations. Unlike other areas of healthcare, emergency providers often treat patients without prior relationships or complete medical histories. Decisions must be made quickly, frequently under conditions of overcrowding and resource constraints. These factors increase the likelihood of diagnostic errors, communication breakdowns, and procedural mistakes.

Published on:

Introduction

Accurate medical diagnosis forms the foundation of effective healthcare. Physicians rely on a systematic clinical evaluation process to determine the cause of a patient’s symptoms and to provide appropriate treatment. When this process fails, the consequences can be devastating for patients and their families.

One of the most common sources of diagnostic error involves the failure to properly rule out serious medical conditions. When a physician evaluates a patient, they must consider multiple possible diagnoses and carefully determine which conditions are likely and which conditions must be excluded. This process is central to medical decision making and is widely recognized as a critical component of the standard of care.

Published on:

Introduction

After a serious crash or injury, many people immediately search online for the best lawyer for an accident in Chicago. Medical bills, insurance calls, and lost income can quickly become overwhelming, and having an experienced personal injury attorney can help protect your rights and guide you through the legal process.

Chicago is a large city with many law firms, which makes choosing the right lawyer an important decision. The best accident lawyers combine experience, strong results, and a commitment to helping injured victims recover the compensation they deserve.

Published on:

Failure to diagnose an acute thoracic aortic dissection (TAD) represents one of the most catastrophic errors in emergency medicine. Despite being a rare condition—with an estimated annual incidence of 3–4 cases per 100,000 people—its mortality rises by approximately 1–2% per hour after symptom onset if untreated. This white paper examines the intersection of clinical oversight and medical malpractice, focusing on failure to rule in or rule out an aortic dissection during initial emergency presentation. Drawing from clinical literature and legal precedent, it explores diagnostic standards, systemic failures, and medico-legal accountability.

Introduction

An aortic dissection occurs when a tear in the intimal layer of the aorta allows blood to enter the media, creating a false lumen and threatening rupture or organ ischemia. Early recognition is essential, as delayed or missed diagnosis accounts for up to 38% of pre-hospital deaths. In the context of medical malpractice, the failure to consider or exclude aortic dissection in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain is among the most litigated errors in emergency care.

Published on:

Executive Summary

Differential diagnosis is the backbone of safe and competent medical practice. It is not merely a clinical formality. It is a structured, legally significant process that requires physicians to consider, prioritize, and rule out potential causes of a patient’s symptoms. When a life threatening condition appears on a differential diagnosis, the standard of care requires that it be affirmatively ruled out within a reasonable time frame. Failure to do so may constitute medical negligence.

This white paper examines the legal and medical intersection of differential diagnosis, index of suspicion, and malpractice exposure. It explains how breakdowns in clinical reasoning lead to preventable harm and why such failures frequently form the basis of claims handled by a misdiagnosis lawyer or failure to diagnose lawyer. It also highlights the role of experienced counsel such as Goldberg & Goldberg LLC and trial attorney Ian Alexander in litigating these complex cases.

Published on:

Birth asphyxia and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy represent two of the most serious medical conditions associated with preventable birth injury. In Cook County Illinois and throughout Chicago Illinois, these conditions continue to raise both medical and legal concerns when failures in obstetric care contribute to long term neurological damage.

This white paper examines the medical relationship between birth asphyxia and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, outlines risk factors and standards of care, and discusses how families in Cook County Illinois can seek accountability through experienced legal representation such as Goldberg & Goldberg, LLC. The goal is to provide a clear, evidence based framework for healthcare professionals, legal practitioners, and affected families.

Introduction

Published on:

Introduction: Protecting Your Newborn’s Rights After a Birth Injury

Bringing a child into the world is supposed to be one of life’s happiest moments, but when complications occur, especially if your newborn suffers an injury at birth, shock and uncertainty can follow. For many families, birth injuries lead to significant emotional and financial challenges. If you suspect your child has suffered an injury during delivery, knowing your next steps can make a world of difference.

As a trusted Chicago Illinois personal injury law firm, Goldberg & Goldberg has helped countless families navigate the complexities of birth injury claims. In this guide, we break down what you need to do immediately, how to protect your child’s health, and why legal support is critical.

Published on:

Understanding the Real Meaning of Trial Work

Trial work is more than standing before a jury and delivering sharp arguments—it’s the art and discipline of guiding a case from uncertainty to clarity. At its heart, trial work is a blend of preparation, persuasion, and performance. It’s the work that tests a lawyer’s instincts, judgment, composure, and command of the law.

Good trial work has always been about more than theatrics. The real craft lies in understanding how facts, people, and law interact once a case steps into a courtroom. A trial lawyer lives in that intersection, translating complexity into narratives that judges and juries can not only follow, but believe.

Published on:

For over 50 years the lawyers at Goldberg & Goldberg, LLC have represented the victims of Birth Injury and Birth Trauma caused by the hands of doctors and hospitals.  Over that period of time, we have learned a thing or two about birth injuries, how they occur, what impact they have on the victim over a lifetime and how to litigate birth injury cases.  This blog post is an effort to educate the families of the victims of birth trauma on how to proceed with a birth injury or birth trauma lawsuit.

baby-300x169

  1. NOT ALL LAWYERS ARE CREATED EQUAL:  This might sound snobby, and we apologize if it does, but as obvious as this statement is, most people do not know how to spot someone who has expertise in birth injury litigation and someone that doesn’t.  The internet has allowed a class of lawyers to develop that are only interested in advertising their services in order to find cases to refer to other lawyers who actually know how to handle these cases.  In the City of Chicago, there are very few lawyers that have the competency and financial resources to handle a birth injury case.  Internet lawyers advertise for birth injury cases in the hopes of referring them to a lawyer that knows what he/she is doing and getting a percentage of the fee.  These lawyers do not actually handle their own cases.  How do you avoid these lawyers?  Ask the right questions.  Ask them to show you examples of settlements and verdicts that they have obtained as lead counsel.  If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is usually a duck.  The same can be said about trial lawyers.
  2.  WHY CAN’T I DO THIS ON MY OWN?:  In almost all cases you need a lawyer to handle a birth injury case on behalf of your injured friend or loved one.  Birth Injury cases are some of the most complex and difficult cases a lawyer can handle.  The medicine is complex and the lawyers hired by the hospitals and doctors are sophisticated.  Regardless of what risk management at the hospital might tell you, if you attempt to handle a complex matter like a birth injury case on your own, you will not be treated fairly.  Hire a lawyer early to protect your rights.
Contact Information